Reading: Chi, T., H., Active-Constructive-Interactive: A Conceptual Framework for Differentiating Learning Activities

Topics in Cognitive Science I (2009)

Main point:

Active, constructive and interactive are commonly used terms in the cognitive and learning sciences. But the definitions are not always clear except for constructive. This article provides a framework and proposes a way to differentiate those terms.

From best to worst: Interactive>constructive>active>(passive)

Interactive often describes a system rather than the interactions between a learner and a system. In this article active, constructive and interactive are viewed as types of overt learning activities (from learner’s side).

Taxonomy

Being active is doing something while learning (often involving physical movements). Examples:

  • steering and peddling a stationary bike while traveling through virtual environment
  • looking and searching some specific locations on a chessboard
  • pointing and gesturing at what one is reading or solving
  • copying and pasting some parts of a text
  • repeating sentences verbatim
  • manipulating video tapes (pausing and rewinding etc)
  • rotating objects
  • selecting from a menu of choices

Note: in memory literature repeating words is a passive learning strategy but in this taxonomy it is active

Being constructive is another set of overt activities that cause learners to produce additional output that can contain new relevant ideas that were not in the initial material. Being constructive includes being active. Examples:

  • self-explaining
  • drawing a concept map
  • taking notes
  • asking questions
  • posing problems
  • comparing cases
  • making plans
  • integrating text and diagram
  • reflecting and monitoring own understanding
  • inducing hypotheses
  • constructing timelines (history)

Being interactive is having a dialogue with a human or a machine. Not all dialogues are interactive. Dialogues that are interactive:

  • instructional dialogues with an expert (teacher)
  • joint dialogues with a peer

CLT and this framework are different but can complement each other: CLT can always reduce memory load whether the learning is active, constructive or interactive.

Reading: Hamilton, L. Case studies in educational research. (2011)

This is a small article published online by British Educational Research Association: http://www.bera.ac.uk/resources/case-studies-educational-research

A few things that I lined out for myself

“…case study approach is often used to build up a rich picture of an entity, using different kinds of data collection…”

“… an alternative form of case study/…/ is the model which is used most frequently by those in education: an instrumental or delimited case study. In this latter form, the focus is usually on an issue, problem or dilemma etc within the case.”

Key choices:

  1. Issue/problem
  2. Creating a research aim and questions
  3. Holistic or instrumental case study approach
  4. Who are the key individuals who might participate
  5. Data collection tools – which are most likely to provide you with the kind of data which will help you to answer your research questions?
  6. ‘Sampling’ careful consideration of choices and key aspects which might have relevance for the project
  7. Risk assessment: potential problems and how you might deal with them.  Possible compromises/back up cases

This little article is a teaser of the upcoming book “Using Case Studies in Education Research”. Hamilton, L., Corbett-Whittier, C., Fowler, Z. London: Sage (coming Nov. 2012)

From the references to be read:

Bassey, M. (1999) Case Study Research in educational settings. Buckingham: Open University Press