Reading: The Differences between Novice and Expert Group-Piano Teaching Strategies: A Case Study and Comparison of Beginning Group Piano Classes

Pike, P. D. (2014). The Differences between Novice and Expert Group-Piano Teaching Strategies: A Case Study and Comparison of Beginning Group Piano Classes. International Journal Of Music Education, 32(2), 213-227.

Abstract:

This case study compares the teaching strategies employed by a novice and an expert instructor of two beginning children’s group-piano classes. In the United States, there is a century-long tradition of teaching piano to children in groups, and group teaching is championed in pedagogy texts and at professional educator conferences throughout the world. However,  there are few meaningful formal opportunities for professional development of group-teaching skills or for observation of successful group-piano instruction available to teachers who wish to develop group teaching skills. This exploratory study seeks to provide some initial data about group-teaching practices of novice and expert teachers. Curricular considerations, teaching techniques, and student engagement and learning emerged as common themes. Analysis highlights how the components of these themes manifested themselves in these novice and expert teachers’ classes and describes how these teaching techniques affected students. It is hoped that future research will include testing new paradigms for training teachers to work effectively with groups of beginning piano students.

Reading: Lessons for Teachers: What Lower Secondary School Students Tell Us about Learning a Musical Instrument

Lowe, G. (2012). Lessons for Teachers: What Lower Secondary School Students Tell Us about Learning a Musical Instrument. International Journal Of Music Education, 30(3), 227-243.

Problem: “Retaining students in elective music programs through to the senior years is an international problem. Walker (2003) states that only 5% of the total student cohort in North America enroll in elective music programs in senior school, while Bray (2000) reports only around 2% of students undertake A level music studies in the United Kingdom (UK). In Western Australia three out of four students in the government system cease learning an instrument before their final year of secondary school and, at a federal level, retention has been highlighted as a priority area requiring urgent attention.”

Instrument lessons in West Australia:

“Orchestral instruments are taught by specialist peripatetic staff on a weekly basis. Lessons range from 20–30 minutes each, and students in the first year of secondary school generally learn in groups ranging from one to five. Students are withdrawn from regular classes on a rotating timetable basis to minimize the impact on other school subjects. /…/ Wind and brass students commence in-school instruction in year 6 in primary school, and string players start earlier. As year 8 (ages 12–13) is the first year of secondary school in WA, on-going students are into at least their third year of learning when they enter year 8.”
Positive aspects that students brought out:
  • an intimate, comfortable and non-threatening learning environment that is different from other subjects
  • teacher attitude associated with rapport and respect
  • professional teacher attributes including organization, enthusiasm, encouragement and patience
  • professional musician attributes including the ability to model the instrument to a high standard
  • activity selection, relating to repertoire choice and ensemble playing
Negative aspects that students brought out:
  • dislike of technical work, particularly the need to practice scales
  • differing levels of ability which lead to embarrassment and feelings of incompetence
  • repetition, including a lack of repertoire turnover
  • lack of rapport with the teacher, manifested in a lack of attention and lack of encouragement

 

Reading: Profiles in Successful Group Piano for Children: A Collective Case Study of Children’s Group-Piano Lessons

Pike, P. D. (2013). Profiles in Successful Group Piano for Children: A Collective Case Study of Children’s Group-Piano Lessons. Music Education Research, 15(1), 92-106.

From literature overview I get a confirmation that indeed, piano group lessons are very common in the States:

“Teaching adult piano students in groups is quite common throughout North America, particularly at colleges and universities where music majors, who are not pianists, enrol in group piano and theory concurrently. Typically, these students learn as much in 16 weeks as a child enrolled in private piano lessons for two years (Lyke 1996), /…/ Numerous articles have been written on the subject and many benefits of teaching beginning piano to adults using the group instructional approach have been documented (Enoch 1974; Fisher 2010). For children, inclusion of piano classes in public school curricula in the United States began in the early decades of the twentieth century. Historic class methods, materials and teacher instructional materials are the primary source of information about early group-piano endeavours in the United States.”
Further reading: Fisher, C. 2010. Teaching piano in groups. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Participants:
2015-03-13-141127_593x159_scrot
 Materials for the group A:
  • The Music Tree: Time to Begin (Clark, Goss, and Holland 2000a),
  • The Music Tree: Writing (Clark, Goss, and Holland 2000b),
  • Alfred’s Premier Piano Performance book 1A (Alexander et al. 2005),
  • Alfred’s Ensemble book 1 (Kowalchyk and Lancaster 1994) and
  • Hal Leonard Ensemble level 1
“Activities included off-bench activities, group dictation at the whiteboard, group rhythm and movement exercises, group discovery at the keyboard, numerous ensemble experiences, performance, sight playing, technique, ear training, improvisation and critical listening activities. There was a balance between playing aloud with the group and playing over headphones, with the instructor being heard through headphones. This allowed students to compare themselves with the ideal performance of the music. Some MIDI accompaniments were used with solo repertoire performance to help students internalise the pulse.”
Everyone on group A were at the same level.
Materials for group B:
  • Piano Adventures level 1A or 1B (Faber and Faber 2011),
  • Theory Gymnastics: Animato (Zisette, Zundel, and Lloyd 2009),
  • Piano Adventures: Christmas book (Faber and Faber 1996) and
  • Hal Leonard Ensemble level 1 (Keveren 1996)
Two distinct levels in this group although everyone on their second year.
“When the teacher worked on technique, sight playing and repertoire, she divided the class into two groups (according to skill level). While one group worked together at the acoustic piano, the second group completed written

theory exercises or worked independently on digital keyboards. Ear training, games with manipulatives, and ensemble repertoire were experienced together as a larger group.”
Group C:
  • Hal Leonard Lesson, Theory, and Technique books, levels 4 and 5 (Keveren et al. 1996).
  • Each girl had a different repertoire book, various individual pieces of sheet music and
  • Hal Leonard Ensemble (Keveren 1996)

“When the students played individually, all of the girls gathered around the piano, spotting problems, assessing performance, offering helpful advice and supporting their peers. The students who were not quite as advanced were learning about what they would be doing soon and about upcoming technical requirements. There was a lot of discovery learning occurring during this portion of the lesson.”

Motivation ideas: ‘Technique Olympics’ at the end of the semester, ‘Music money':

2015-03-13-142739_625x553_scrot

Group D:

  • Hal Leonard Lesson, Theory, and Technique books, levels 4 and 5 (Keveren et al. 1996)
  • Each student had a different repertoire book
“The in-class activities were more varied and included improvisation, composition, ear training, theory, performance, active listening and even general musicianship through games. /…/ Each of the students performed solo repertoire for 9 to 12 minutes of class time. Students in this class availed of performance with MIDI accompaniments. Each student heard a variety of repertoire throughout the lesson.”

 

Reading: Teachers’ Practices and Beliefs Regarding Teaching Tuning in Elementary and Middle School Group String Classes

Hopkins, M. T. (2013). Teachers’ Practices and Beliefs Regarding Teaching Tuning in Elementary and Middle School Group String Classes. Journal Of Research In Music Education, 61(1), 97-114. doi:10.1177/0022429412473607

Not very relevant to my topic. Still, some knowledge about strings in group: children have problems with tuning in a group setting and teachers often feel they are not instructed to teach that. At the same time only 33% uses electronic tuners. It seems to take 4.5 years to obtain the necessary tuning skills.

Reading: University-level group piano instruction and professional musicians

Young, M. M. (2013). University-level group piano instruction and professional musicians. Music Education Research, 15(1), 59-73. doi:10.1080/14613808.2012.737773

I mostly care about the literature overview here:

Group piano courses originated in Europe during the early nineteenth century (Richards 1962). /…/ By the twentieth century, group piano courses were included in private schools and public elementary schools and in the 1930s were introduced to universities. /…/ Currently, group piano classes can be found in private studios, public schools and institutions of higher education (Tsai 2007). Teachers continue to employ the group piano format because it is efficient and musical skills develop more quickly in a group setting (Kokotsaki and Hallam 2007; Shockley 1982).
Of the settings in which group piano classes can take place, university-level group piano courses are most common (Tsai 2007). University-level group piano courses fall into two major categories: courses for music majors and for non-music majors. Courses for non-music majors introduce non-musicians to reading notation and beginning piano pieces, whereas piano classes for music majors are responsible for developing the functional piano skills that undergraduate music students will use in the future (Chin 2002; National Association of Schools of Music [NASM] 2009; Tsai 2007). Now ubiquitous in universities and colleges in the USA, group piano courses for music majors are charged with developing the functional piano skills that undergraduate music students will use in their intended careers (Chin 2002; NASM 2009).

Reading: The attitudes of prospective music teachers to school musical instrument (Recorder) courses

Ataman, O. G. (2014). THE ATTITUDES OF PROSPECTIVE MUSIC TEACHERS TO SCHOOL MUSICAL INSTRUMENT (RECORDER) COURSES. International Journal Of Academic Research, 6(2), 231-238. doi:10.7813/2075-4124.2014/6-2/B.34
Sample:
2015-03-13-105101_526x213_scrot
 Results:
2015-03-13-105039_809x458_scrotNobody seems to like studying the recorder in Turkey :) Or as the author puts it: “…prospective music teachers do not love School Musical Instruments (Recorder) courses enough; they do not take interest in these courses; they do not enjoy participating in these courses; and they fear these courses.”
He cites Kivrak: “There is a very serious tuning problem despite what is said. /…/ it is clear that a serious sound clarity problem will be experienced in collective playing activities when it is considered that the students in the learning stage cannot maintain breath control even though tuning is performed for each musical instrument.”
Conclusion:
– Curriculums of School Musical Instruments (Recorder) courses must be revised by the relevant academicians.
– It is recommended giving auditory examples related to the recorder in School Musical Instruments (Recorder) courses